The Federal Reserve is introducing its new mortgage protection plan today to help bailout struggling borrowers. The rules it’s proposing are particularly aimed at protecting those who might find subprime loans their only alternative because of low income or poor credit.The Fed proposes these regulations:
* Barring or restricting lenders from penalizing subprime borrowers who pay their loans off early.
* Forcing lenders to make sure that borrowers, especially subprime ones, set aside money to pay for taxes and insurance.
* Barring or limiting loans that do not require proof of a borrower's income.
* Setting new standards for how lenders determine a borrower's ability to repay a home loan.
The plan, if ultimately adopted, offers Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who took over the helm in February 2006, an important opportunity to put his imprint on the Fed's regulatory powers.
Source: The Associated Press, Jeannine Aversa (12/18/07)
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Thursday, December 13, 2007
3 Places to Find Money for a Down Payment
Buyers who don’t have a 20 percent down payment are finding it harder and harder to buy a home. Here are some sources of money that are still available and the pluses and minuses of using them.
Borrowing from a 401(k). Only some companies allow this. The maximum available is $50,000 ($100,00 if both spouses have 401(k)s) and the loan must be repaid within five years. Failure to do so and the loan will be considered a withdrawal, leaving the borrower liable for penalties and federal income tax.
Withdrawing up to $10,000 from an IRA for a purchase of a first home. Spouses who both have IRAs can withdrawal a total of $20,000. A potential borrower who hasn’t owned a home in the past three years is considered a "first-time buyer" for this specific purpose and can make a withdrawal. Federal taxes must be paid on the withdrawal at the borrower’s current marginal tax rate.
A gift. If buyers are comfortable asking for money, their parents, friends, and relatives can give a gift toward the down payment. But for the lender to approve it, the giver must sign a gift letter stating that the money doesn’t need to be repaid.
Source: ThinkGlink.com, Ilyce Glink (12/07/2007)
Borrowing from a 401(k). Only some companies allow this. The maximum available is $50,000 ($100,00 if both spouses have 401(k)s) and the loan must be repaid within five years. Failure to do so and the loan will be considered a withdrawal, leaving the borrower liable for penalties and federal income tax.
Withdrawing up to $10,000 from an IRA for a purchase of a first home. Spouses who both have IRAs can withdrawal a total of $20,000. A potential borrower who hasn’t owned a home in the past three years is considered a "first-time buyer" for this specific purpose and can make a withdrawal. Federal taxes must be paid on the withdrawal at the borrower’s current marginal tax rate.
A gift. If buyers are comfortable asking for money, their parents, friends, and relatives can give a gift toward the down payment. But for the lender to approve it, the giver must sign a gift letter stating that the money doesn’t need to be repaid.
Source: ThinkGlink.com, Ilyce Glink (12/07/2007)
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Tougher Standards Drive Up the Cost of Homeownership
Even borrowers with decent credit are beginning to feel the mortgage crisis pinch.
Fannie Mae, soon to be followed by Freddie Mac, has imposed an extra 0.25 percent upfront charge on all new mortgages that it buys or guarantees.
In a statement, Fannie said the new fee is needed "to ensure that what we charge aligns with the risk we bear." The National Association of Home Builders labeled the fee "a broad tax on homeownership" because more than 40 percent of all mortgages outstanding are owned or guaranteed by Fannie or Freddie.
Mortgage insurers have raised premiums for certain borrowers and tightened standards. PMI Group Inc. has stopped writing mortgage insurance for borrowers with credit scores below 620 who are financing more than 95 percent of their home's value. Triad Guaranty Insurance Corp. has stopped providing mortgage insurance on option adjustable-rate mortgages, which carry low introductory rates but can lead to a rising loan balance.
The bar for credit scores is rising, too. "Historically, lenders would consider top-tier credit [a score of] 680," says David Soleymani, a mortgage broker in Los Angeles. "Now, many of those lenders want to see a 720," but are rewarding such borrowers with better rates, he says.
Source: The Wall Street Journal, James R. Hagerty and Ruth Simon (12/11/07)
Fannie Mae, soon to be followed by Freddie Mac, has imposed an extra 0.25 percent upfront charge on all new mortgages that it buys or guarantees.
In a statement, Fannie said the new fee is needed "to ensure that what we charge aligns with the risk we bear." The National Association of Home Builders labeled the fee "a broad tax on homeownership" because more than 40 percent of all mortgages outstanding are owned or guaranteed by Fannie or Freddie.
Mortgage insurers have raised premiums for certain borrowers and tightened standards. PMI Group Inc. has stopped writing mortgage insurance for borrowers with credit scores below 620 who are financing more than 95 percent of their home's value. Triad Guaranty Insurance Corp. has stopped providing mortgage insurance on option adjustable-rate mortgages, which carry low introductory rates but can lead to a rising loan balance.
The bar for credit scores is rising, too. "Historically, lenders would consider top-tier credit [a score of] 680," says David Soleymani, a mortgage broker in Los Angeles. "Now, many of those lenders want to see a 720," but are rewarding such borrowers with better rates, he says.
Source: The Wall Street Journal, James R. Hagerty and Ruth Simon (12/11/07)
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Fed cuts key rate a quarter-point
Central bank reacts to widening mortgage crisis with third drop of the year
The Associated Press updated 11:45 a.m. PT, Tues., Dec. 11, 2007
The Federal Reserve cut a key interest rate by one-quarter of a percentage point Tuesday, trying to keep the country out of recession.
The reduction in the federal funds rate to 4.25 percent marked the third rate cut in the past three months. Fed officials signaled that further cuts were possible if a severe downturn in housing and a crisis in mortgage lending get worse.
Commercial banks were expected to quickly match the latest reduction by trimming their prime lending rate, which would reduce this benchmark rate for millions of consumer and business loans to 7.25 percent.
In addition to cutting the funds rate, the Fed announced it was reducing its discount rate, the interest it charges to make direct loans to banks, by a quarter-point as well to 4.75 percent. This reduction was aimed at encouraging banks to borrow more freely from the Fed at a time when there are worries that a rising number of bad loans will prompt banks to tighten credit conditions too severely, adding another strain on the already fragile economy.
The Fed embarked on this round of rate cuts in September in response to severe turbulence in credit markets around the globe as investors reacted to various reports of mounting losses from defaults in subprime mortgages, the latest fallout from the worst slump in the U.S. housing market in more than two decades.
After cutting the funds rate by a half-point on Sept. 11 and a quarter-point on Oct. 31, the central bank indicated that those two reductions might be all that were needed to combat the threat of a recession given that financial markets appeared to be stabilizing.
However, increased market turbulence following the October meeting and growing fears of a recession caused the Fed to do an about-face.
In a brief statement explaining its action, the Fed said that recent economic data indicated that the economy is slowing, “reflecting the intensification of the housing correction and some softening in business and consumer spending.”
The Fed also noted that “strains in financial markets have increased in recent weeks.”
In its Oct. 31 statement, the Fed said it viewed the risks from weak growth as roughly balanced with the risks of higher inflation.
However, that phrase was changed in the current statement to read, “Recent developments, including the deterioration in financial market conditions, have increased the uncertainty surrounding the outlook for economic growth and inflation.”
The Fed vote for the rate cut was 9 to 1 with Eric S. Rosengren dissenting, arguing for a bigger, half-point cut in the funds rate.
Many economists believe the housing slump and credit turmoil have raised the risks of a recession. Many analysts believe that economic growth, as measured by the gross domestic product, may have dipped to a barely perceptible 1 percent rate, raising the chance that some shock, such as another surge in energy prices, could push the country into a recession.
But many analysts still believe the Fed will be able to respond forcefully enough with rate cuts that it will keep the current expansion alive. These analysts believe that the economy will start to rebound to faster growth by the middle of next year, when they expect that lower mortgage rates will have spurred a rebound in home sales.
“I think a full blown recession can be avoided but just barely,” said David Jones, chief economist at DMJ Advisors. He predicted that the Fed will follow up its December rate cut with three more reductions at its first three meetings of 2008.
Full text of Fed statementThe full text of the Fed's statement released with the announcement is below:
The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 25 basis points to 4-1/4 percent.
Incoming information suggests that economic growth is slowing, reflecting the intensification of the housing correction and some softening in business and consumer spending. Moreover, strains in financial markets have increased in recent weeks. Today’s action, combined with the policy actions taken earlier, should help promote moderate growth over time.
Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year, but elevated energy and commodity prices, among other factors, may put upward pressure on inflation. In this context, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain, and it will continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.
Recent developments, including the deterioration in financial market conditions, have increased the uncertainty surrounding the outlook for economic growth and inflation. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Charles L. Evans; Thomas M. Hoenig; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Frederic S. Mishkin; William Poole; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against was Eric S. Rosengren, who preferred to lower the target for the federal funds rate by 50 basis points
© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22202624/
The Associated Press updated 11:45 a.m. PT, Tues., Dec. 11, 2007
The Federal Reserve cut a key interest rate by one-quarter of a percentage point Tuesday, trying to keep the country out of recession.
The reduction in the federal funds rate to 4.25 percent marked the third rate cut in the past three months. Fed officials signaled that further cuts were possible if a severe downturn in housing and a crisis in mortgage lending get worse.
Commercial banks were expected to quickly match the latest reduction by trimming their prime lending rate, which would reduce this benchmark rate for millions of consumer and business loans to 7.25 percent.
In addition to cutting the funds rate, the Fed announced it was reducing its discount rate, the interest it charges to make direct loans to banks, by a quarter-point as well to 4.75 percent. This reduction was aimed at encouraging banks to borrow more freely from the Fed at a time when there are worries that a rising number of bad loans will prompt banks to tighten credit conditions too severely, adding another strain on the already fragile economy.
The Fed embarked on this round of rate cuts in September in response to severe turbulence in credit markets around the globe as investors reacted to various reports of mounting losses from defaults in subprime mortgages, the latest fallout from the worst slump in the U.S. housing market in more than two decades.
After cutting the funds rate by a half-point on Sept. 11 and a quarter-point on Oct. 31, the central bank indicated that those two reductions might be all that were needed to combat the threat of a recession given that financial markets appeared to be stabilizing.
However, increased market turbulence following the October meeting and growing fears of a recession caused the Fed to do an about-face.
In a brief statement explaining its action, the Fed said that recent economic data indicated that the economy is slowing, “reflecting the intensification of the housing correction and some softening in business and consumer spending.”
The Fed also noted that “strains in financial markets have increased in recent weeks.”
In its Oct. 31 statement, the Fed said it viewed the risks from weak growth as roughly balanced with the risks of higher inflation.
However, that phrase was changed in the current statement to read, “Recent developments, including the deterioration in financial market conditions, have increased the uncertainty surrounding the outlook for economic growth and inflation.”
The Fed vote for the rate cut was 9 to 1 with Eric S. Rosengren dissenting, arguing for a bigger, half-point cut in the funds rate.
Many economists believe the housing slump and credit turmoil have raised the risks of a recession. Many analysts believe that economic growth, as measured by the gross domestic product, may have dipped to a barely perceptible 1 percent rate, raising the chance that some shock, such as another surge in energy prices, could push the country into a recession.
But many analysts still believe the Fed will be able to respond forcefully enough with rate cuts that it will keep the current expansion alive. These analysts believe that the economy will start to rebound to faster growth by the middle of next year, when they expect that lower mortgage rates will have spurred a rebound in home sales.
“I think a full blown recession can be avoided but just barely,” said David Jones, chief economist at DMJ Advisors. He predicted that the Fed will follow up its December rate cut with three more reductions at its first three meetings of 2008.
Full text of Fed statementThe full text of the Fed's statement released with the announcement is below:
The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 25 basis points to 4-1/4 percent.
Incoming information suggests that economic growth is slowing, reflecting the intensification of the housing correction and some softening in business and consumer spending. Moreover, strains in financial markets have increased in recent weeks. Today’s action, combined with the policy actions taken earlier, should help promote moderate growth over time.
Readings on core inflation have improved modestly this year, but elevated energy and commodity prices, among other factors, may put upward pressure on inflation. In this context, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain, and it will continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.
Recent developments, including the deterioration in financial market conditions, have increased the uncertainty surrounding the outlook for economic growth and inflation. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Charles L. Evans; Thomas M. Hoenig; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Frederic S. Mishkin; William Poole; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against was Eric S. Rosengren, who preferred to lower the target for the federal funds rate by 50 basis points
© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22202624/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
